Last week I attended a Rent Control Luncheon hosted by the Beverly Hills Greater Los Angeles Association of Realtors. L.A.’s rent control laws are quite strict…any investor or person looking to purchase and occupy a multi-family dwelling really needs to know these laws BEFORE purchasing. Here are highlight notes I’d taken:
L.A. City:
- Law Applications:
Rent control applies to 2 or more units (per lot) build prior to 1978
Rent control DOES NOT apply to single family homes
Rent control DOES apply to condos in most situations
Maximum allowable annual rent increase is 4%
- Legal Eviction/Relocation
Qualified: 62 yrs+, disabled or family (parent(s) with children named on lease). $8550 relocation fee
Others: $3450 relocation fee
60 days from close of escrow (though there was much debate on this, even the spokesperson for LA City Rent Stabilization said he believes it MIGHT only be 30 days.
Legal relocation does not overrule a lease. Tenant has the right to stay through term of lease. i.e.….month-to-month, 60 days. Lease, expiration of lease or 60 days (whichever is longer).
- Unlike West Hollywood, LA City landlords are not required to paint units every 4 years and replace carpets every 7 years. There currently aren’t any laws requiring LA city landlords to paint or replace carpet, however, by law, units ARE to remain in acceptable condition.
- If a L.A. City landlord is out of compliance and caught by the rent stabilization board, the property may become part of a program called REAP, which is highly restricted and regulated by the board. (You DON’T want this to happen). For more information on this and everything else related to rent control laws in L.A. City, see www.lacity.org/lahd
Culver City, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Inglewood: NO rent control
Santa Monica:
- Pretty much all laws pertaining to LA City also pertain to Santa Monica with the following increased restrictions:
- 3 units or less (when owner/occupied) may become EXEMPT from rent control laws! However, when that owner sells the property to a non-owner/occupant, the building reverts back to rent control, and rents for current tenants are to be reduced to 1999-level rents + 4% annual (for 2006, for example, the rents would be converted this way: 1999 standard + 4% + 4% + 4%, etc…
- If a buyer intends to owner/occupy, he can’t simply evict any tenant/unit he wishes. Rather, it must be a month-to-month tenant who has most recently moved into the building and is residing in a unit which most similarly matches the buyer’s needs (a single person/buyer couldn’t evict a family from a 2 or 3 bedroom unit if there are singles or 1 bedrooms in the building).
July 22, 2006 at 8:30 pm
And … a landlord may pass through 50% of the annual $18.71 RSO registration fee to the tenant, once a year, $9.35 in June … OK
And … a landlord may pass through 100% of the annual $35.53 SCEP fee, to the tenant, in the form of a monthly surcharge of $2.96
Does anyone find the monthly surcharge thing as big a PITA as I do? The amount of extra bookeeping! … OK, Fine, if you only have a couple rentals. For several, sheesh!
July 23, 2006 at 3:48 am
Yeah, leaves you thinkin’ “who MADE these laws?” That’s why I have a duplex and triplex, both in Long Beach (NO rent control!)… But, of course, higher appreciation potential in parts of L.A…